Students scholars and practitioners alike will benefit from this comprehensive study of environmental governance. Abstract: Managers of Global Change provides a welcome return to careful attention to the possibilities and patterns of organizational agency. This should not lead to a neglect of continued empirical studies of regime effectiveness. The article also outlines four crosscutting research themes that are crucial for the study of each analytical problem as well as for the integrated understanding of earth system governance: the role of power, knowledge, norms and scale. The focus is on three emerging trends that result from stalemates in intergovernmental negotiations, but may also further complicate decision-making. This article extends the ambit of public administration and policy studies into what has traditionally been considered the realm of International Relations scholarship to identify and map new modes of global public policy and transnational administration and prospects for ongoing conceptualization. .
It outlines the concept of earth system governance as a challenge for the social sciences, and it elaborates on the interlinked analytical problems and research questions of earth system governance as an object of study. Globalization processes have rendered non-state actors an integral part of global governance. We illustrate the contribution our approach to rationalization makes by looking at budget support to sub-Saharan African states, and Mozambique in particular. While providing a useful way of organizing the chapter authors' observations, it is not clear that this framework provides any particular advance in the sticky problem of measuring or even identifying effects, about which so much ink has been spilt. Such regimes may be clearly geared towards a specific environmental issue, which is at the core of the institutional design. The E-mail message field is required.
We analyze the global environmental governance architecture for conserving migratory shorebirds in the Asia-Pacific. Register a free 1 month Trial Account. Trondal, Jarle; Marcussen, Martin; Larsson, Torbjorn; Veggeland, Frode 2010 : Unpacking International Organisations: The Dynamics of Compound Bureaucracies. Peace scholars are increasingly inclined to apply and extend concepts such as sustainable development, global change, and ecological security. It is insightful in highlighting the role that international bureaucracies do play in international negotiations and how they may, in some circumstances, shape international negotiations. Moreover, we argue that this case raises important questions concerning the appropriate role of secretariats in international politics and has important policy implications with several new secretariats currently being set up under the burgeoning number of regional trade agreements under negotiation by the United States and many others.
Yet what such strategies might be, how they could be developed, and how effective, efficient and equitable such strategies would be, remains unspecified. Our findings allow classifying them into three groups for which we expect differences in political contestation about evaluation use: two extreme-case groups either member state or administrative dominance and a group of contested middle cases. Reviews: Managers of Global Change: The Influence of International Environmental Bureaucracies, The Changing Governance of Renewable Natural Resources in Northwest Russia, Factor Five: Transforming the Global Economy through 80% Improvements in Resource Productivity, Governing the Tap: Special District Governance and the New Local Politics of Water - Susan Park, Michael Bradshaw, Charlie Wilson, Alison Browne, 2010 Reviews: Managers of Global Change: The Influence of International Environmental Bureaucracies, The Changing Governance of Renewable Natural Resources in Northwest Russia, Factor Five: Transforming the Global Economy through 80% Improvements in Resource Productivity, Governing the Tap: Special District Governance and the New Local Politics of Water This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 3. We include examples and references from recent studies to show when and how best to utilize these different methods to conduct problem-driven research. It also reviews the state of the art in the academic disciplines of international relations and organizational and management studies. Less attention has been paid to the comparative advantages of non-state actors to answer questions about agency across categories of non-state actors, and more precisely what governance activities non-state actors are perceived to fulfil. International bureaucracies—highly visible, far-reaching actors of global governance in areas that range from finance to the environment—are often derided as ineffective, inefficient, and unresponsive.
In the present paper, we aim to address this gap for two international, six national, and six local adaptation strategies. In January 2017, a new Secretary-General took office on the 38th floor of the United Nations, following a successful campaign to reform the selection process by increasing its transparency. Managers of Global Change fills this gap, offering conceptual analysis and case studies of the role and relevance of international bureaucracies in the area of environmental governance—one of the most institutionally dynamic areas of world politics. On the basis of which criteria can we analyze and compare different justice theories for the globe? These changes require institutional structures capable of steering human society away from critical tipping points and irreversible change and ensuring sustainable livelihoods for all. It seeks to resolve a puzzling disparity: Although most international bureaucracies resemble each other in terms of their institutional and legal settings their mandate, the countries to which they report, their general function , the roles they play and their actual influence vary greatly. Factors that favour utilizing a similar organization structure include scope for donor trust, for bringing in established competence and a comprehensive approach.
These concepts are examined on two levels: as sets of metaphors, which shape how one conceives of problems and solutions, and as social practices, which posit some relationship with existing power structures and institutions and which value some interests and concerns at the expense of others. I then sketch the five key problem structures that complicate earth system governance, and derive from these four overarching principles for earth system governance as political practice, namely credibility, stability, adaptiveness, and inclusiveness. But the explanation for differing levels of bureaucratic influence is also found to lie to a significant degree in the organizational characteristics of bureaucracies: leadership, structure, culture, and expertise. Book Descriptions: Managers Of Global Change The Influence Of International Environmental Bureaucracies is good choice for you that looking for nice reading experience. This book fills this gap, offering conceptual analysis and case studies of the role and relevance of international bureaucracies in the area of environmental governance—one of the most institutionally dynamic areas of world politics. Which methods are more appropriate? Entities with seemingly similar functions, resources, and general mandates are shown here to yield substantially different outputs and, as a result, differing degrees of inÂºuence on the wider Âªeld of actors around them.
Although both concepts present appealing definitions, they rest on a series of metaphorical and institutional associations that many peace scholars will find questionable and problematic. The book seeks to resolve a puzzling disparity: although most international bureaucracies resemble each other in terms of their institutional and legal settings their mandate, the countries to which they report, their general function , the roles they play and their actual influence vary greatly. How do different political actors engage with justice concerns? In 2001, the Earth System Science Partnership declared an urgent need to develop 'strategies for Earth System management'. Thirdly, they point toward variation in the ways that agents may acquire authority. Responsibility: edited by Frank Biermann and Bernd Siebenhüner. To measure the precise proportion of behavioral change attributed to the regime in question may be theoretically possible but it is exceedingly difficult empirically, illustrated by a brief analysis of the climate regime.
Moreover, when we consider the subset of institutional arrangements for habitat conservation and hunting management separately, hunting management emerges as the exclusive domain of the nation-state. In conclusion, the paper points out the need to examine policy transfer among international administrations through actors, interests and strategies, as a complement to holistic approaches. The article is based on an extensive social science assessment conducted by 32 members of the lead faculty, scientific steering committee, and other affiliates of the Earth System Governance Project. Third, we will summarize the findings from the different case studies and draw conclusions on the theoretical approaches discussed in the first part of the course. Although there are still disputes and uncertainties regarding how to measure and explain effectiveness, significant advances have been made.